 
 
 
 
 
  
    <- Previous |
First
 | Next ->
The Crucible by Arthur Miller -  Barron's Booknotes 
 Table of Contents
 
 ACT III, SCENE 6   
 Elizabeth knows nothing of what's happened in the room, but she senses almost immediately that this is a test. What's going
 on is not entirely clear to her, except that John's in trouble and
 his fate depends on her answers to Danforth's questions. From
 where we sit, it's amazing that Elizabeth doesn't see the trap.
 But remember what she's been through in the last week: arrested
 in the middle of the night and hauled off in chains to jail; tried
 as a witch, with the girls in full cry throughout the trial;
 convicted and sentenced to hang; allowed no contact with the
 outside world, especially her husband. If she's exhausted and
 confused, it's not surprising. And if she's reluctant to even open
 her mouth, it's no wonder at all-every word she's said so far in
 her own defense just set the girls to howling all the louder.
 
 But even if she has her wits about her, her mistake is easy to understand. She can see where Danforth's questions are headed,
 but she doesn't know who talked. John may have confessed, but
 isn't it far more likely that Abigail, out of sheer spite, accused
 John first?
 
 Whatever Elizabeth's reasoning, she fails the test. She tells Danforth that her husband is no lecher. As Hale says, it's a
 natural lie to tell; she thought only to save her husband's name.
 But Danforth will have none of it. Proctor claimed that his wife
 couldn't tell a lie; very well, Elizabeth has just cleared Abigail.
 And Proctor's charge against Abigail was nothing but a last-
 ditch effort to overthrow the court.
 If you think for just a moment, this makes no sense at all. If
 Proctor is a liar, then saying that Elizabeth cannot lie could
 itself be a lie. Elizabeth also denied being a witch; Danforth
 obviously thinks this is a lie, or he wouldn't have found her
 guilty and sentenced her to hang. Why should he believe her
 now, when she denies her husband is an adulterer?
 
 One answer can be found near the end of the previous scene. In a stage direction Arthur Miller describes Danforth as "Himself
 engaged and entered by Abigail." This means that she has him
 somehow hypnotized, and that whatever Elizabeth answers, he'll
 see it as letting Abigail off the hook. If Elizabeth says, "Yes,
 Abigail's a whore," it could merely be a plot by the witch and
 her husband to discredit the court's chief witness against her.
 
 There's another possibility, that Danforth's "wits have been turned," just as Abigail threatened. If this is the case, then he
 simply no longer knows what he's doing.
 
 Don't forget that the court has based every one of its decisions solely on the "testimony" of Abigail and the girls. If Abigail has
 been lying, the court is destroyed. Danforth may be taking "any
 port in the storm" to keep his world from collapsing. Proctor
 cannot prove his charge, therefore the charge is false. Abigail is
 vindicated, the court is saved, and the witch is dragged back to
 her cell.
 
 Table of Contents 
  <- Previous |
First
 | Next ->
The Crucible by Arthur Miller -  Barron's Booknotes
 |