Everything that God knows necessarily is, because even what we ourselves know necessarily is; and, of course, our knowledge is not as certain as God’s knowledge is. But no future contingent thing necessarily is..
Among the following statements, which naturally follows from the above:
(A) There are no future contingent things.
(B) It is not true that God has knowledge of only necessary things.
(C) God has knowledge of no contingent future things.
(D) It is not possible for us to know God.
(E) God has knowledge of everything. .
Ans : C
Questions 24-25
Some lawyers are of the view that the observation of the intrinsic qualities of pornography in any composition depends on literary criticism and hence it is a matter of opinion. It is rather odd, though, that in a legal connection, serious critics themselves quite often behave as if they believed criticism to be a matter of opinion. Why be a critic - and teach in universities - in case criticism involves nothing but uttering capricious and arbitrary opinions ?